The ACLU is suing a California county for putting students on criminal probation for 'poor academics'

Schoolchildren.
(Image credit: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

Law enforcement in Riverside County, California, is coming under fire for its Youth Accountability Team, which places "at-risk" children who have committed no crimes on probation, The Appeal reports.

The program, also known as YAT, takes discipline out of the hands of local schools and keeps a close eye on students who are suspected to be "pre-delinquent" or "delinquent." Students can be referred to YAT for substance abuse and gang association, but also for "poor academics" and "school discipline problems." The ACLU filed a lawsuit against Riverside County last week, explaining that the program went beyond its mission of preventing juvenile crime by essentially criminalizing young students for "typical childhood misbehavior."

According to the lawsuit, YAT also disproportionately affects black and Latino students. Between 2005 and 2016, nearly 13,000 teens were under YAT probation, with 25 percent accused of a noncriminal offense. Black students were 2.5 times and Latino students 1.5 times more likely than white students to be accused of "persistently or habitually" refusing to obey school authorities. The ACLU claims that Riverside officials coerce children into waiving their first and fourth amendment rights, and calls it "astonishingly punitive" to replace school disciplinary systems with criminal prosecution.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

The former Riverside County deputy district attorney described the program as a way to "get [youths] into the system by fingerprinting and photographing them," says the lawsuit. "We can do all kinds of surveillance, including wire taps on phones, without having to get permission from a judge," he reportedly said. The program mandates strict curfews, community service, meetings with probation officers, and imposes penalties, without necessarily finding the student guilty of anything but "defiance." YAT "is not only an unlawful tool," writes the ACLU, "it is the wrong tool to help children." Read more at The Appeal.

To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us
Summer Meza, The Week US

Summer Meza has worked at The Week since 2018, serving as a staff writer, a news writer and currently the deputy editor. As a proud news generalist, she edits everything from political punditry and science news to personal finance advice and film reviews. Summer has previously written for Newsweek and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, covering national politics, transportation and the cannabis industry.