The mother of all backlashes

Why Democrats may regret owning Medicare-for-all

Protesters.
(Image credit: AP Photo/Lynne Sladky)

This is the editor’s letter in the current issue of The Week magazine.

"Public sentiment is everything," Abraham Lincoln once said. "With public sentiment, nothing can fail. Without it, nothing can succeed." It's endlessly surprising how often this foundational principle of democratic politics eludes activists and elected officials in both parties' ideological extremes. Sen. Elizabeth Warren has bet her surging presidential campaign on Medicare-for-all, fired by the conviction that 150 million Americans should be happy to trade in private health coverage for a government-run system they've never experienced. But an NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll recently found just 41 percent supported a single-payer system that eliminates private insurance, with 56 percent opposed — a consistent finding in public surveys.

Opposition to Medicare-for-all would only grow during a general election campaign, as Republicans target "socialized medicine" with $1 billion in negative advertising. The ads write themselves: long wait times to see doctors, 30 percent cuts in payments to doctors and 40 percent to hospitals (figures straight from ­Bernie Sanders' plan), hospital closures, and rationing. But let's say Warren wins the election anyway. In a sharply divided country, could Dem­o­crats ram legislation through Con­gress that mandates a 65 percent hike in federal spending, $3 trillion in new taxes, and a revolutionary upheaval in an industry affecting the well-­being of every Amer­i­can? Without Re­pub­li­can votes, Dem­o­crats would own the new health-care ­system — and get full blame every time people were unhappy with their care. A traumatic transition period could trigger the Mother of All Backlashes, more punishing than the Tea Party backlash to Obama­Care that cost Dem­­o­­crats both the House and the Sen­ate. Never mind, say the purists who disdain an optional, "Med­i­care for those who want it" plan as too incremental — despite polls showing this alternative has 75 percent support. Who needs public sentiment when you are certain the public is wrong?

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
To continue reading this article...
Continue reading this article and get limited website access each month.
Get unlimited website access, exclusive newsletters plus much more.
Cancel or pause at any time.
Already a subscriber to The Week?
Not sure which email you used for your subscription? Contact us
William Falk

William Falk is editor-in-chief of The Week, and has held that role since the magazine's first issue in 2001. He has previously been a reporter, columnist, and editor at the Gannett Westchester Newspapers and at Newsday, where he was part of two reporting teams that won Pulitzer Prizes.